On nevadagoldinvestor.blogspot.com you will find 1. products useful to mining companies exploring in Nevada 2. products helpful for institutional and individual investors looking for opportunities to invest in Nevada’s booming gold mining industry 3. a free list of stock exchange listed junior mining companies with properties in Nevada 4. occasional comments on mining companies in Nevada and on investing in natural resources from a geologist's perspective
Methodical Exploration as a Hint for Mining Investors: Aurelian Resources’ Fruta del Norte 13 Million Ounces Gold Discovery in
By Dirk Masuch Oesterreich
Though Aurelian Resources, merged into Kinross Gold last year, is now a story of the past there are important lessons for investors and speculators to be learned from the history of this company.
The success story of Aurelian Resources is probably the best known among junior gold investors in this cycle. In 2006, Aurelian discovered the giant Fruta del Norte epithermal gold deposit in the Cordillera del Condor part of the eastern foothills of the Ecuadorian Andes. The stock went on a meteoric rise which took it from $0.60 to $40 within a few months as continued drilling confirmed the initial grades and thicknesses of more than
Speculative investors reap most of their profits when getting in early on an emerging play. So this discovery raises an interesting question: Is the discovery of a company maker like Fruta del Norte just a lucky shot or are there possibly any prior indications to that a company is about to find something big?
In Aurelian’s case there is in fact an important lesson to learn since there were a lot of signals that the market simply overlooked. While several factors contributed to Aurelian’s success probably the most important single factor was a methodical exploration program tailored to the natural conditions of a difficult to access tropical rainforest and a mountaineous terrain with a great number of streams and rivers.
The very first step in exploration is a thorough historical research to narrow down on preliminary target areas. Field surveys are then conducted to visually examine the prospective areas. In the case in point these preliminary studies showed that a lot of the creeks and rivers in southeast
In this case the source deposit can only be upstream, so that a delineation of the watersheds defines the limits of the area where the deposit has to be located. The mineralization cannot be on the opposite site of the watershed.
Once the perimeter of the gold bearing hydrological basin was defined, Aurelian carried out a textbook stream sediment sample program that lead their geologists upstream to the source of the mineralization. Aurelian consequently integrated these data in a Geographic Information System. A GIS is a software technology designed to analyze and recognize spatial data patterns and to visualize spatial relationships in attractive maps and 3D models. Aurelian made these maps available to the public all the time via their website. These maps are a very good example of a typical stream exploration program. In combination with classic geological mapping, soil sample analysis, geophysical methods, and exploration drill holes, Aurelian defined 30 targets for gold and 12 targets of the porphyry copper type. Assays of samples of the weathered and decayed material of gold bearing rocks showed the presence of pathfinder elements like arsenic and mercury. Additionally, historic mining and gold handcrafts by local residents gave important clues to the potential of the Cordillera del Condor.
An important step in the discovery process was made early on when Aurelian’s geologists recognized an approximately 45 mile long, north-south striking fault zone. Known as the Las Peñas fault this structural element controls the occurrence of gold mineralizations that are literally lined up along this fault.
A tectonic element of these dimensions usually is easy to spot by remote sensing technologies. Examples of NASA satellite imagery could be found in Aurelian’s company brochure on their website as early as 2004, two years before the discovery of Fruta del Norte. To the trained eye, the imagery clearly revealed the structural control of what could possibly define a new unknown gold trend.
In April 2004 Aurelian announced results from 8 boreholes drilled in the Bonza Las Peñas prospect, just south of Fruta del Norte. The most successful bore hole showed 114 meters of 1.58 g/t. Mineralization could be traced over 500 meters and was open to the north, to the south, and to depth. Aurelian’s methodical exploration program was beginning to show early and promising results.
It was in this context that important clues for a similar or even larger deposit in the Fruta del Norte prospect became obvious. Fruta del Norte was interpreted as the northern prolongation of the Bonza las Peñas trend.
Interestingly, Aurelian’s geologists found proof of another fault zone in boreholes in a nearby copper prospect. This fault zone was found to offset the Fruta del Norte zone for about 250 meters to depth against the Bonza Las Peñas deposit. This meant that a possible new deposit in this zone was protected against erosion by the overlying sediments. So chances were that a new discovery within the Fruta del Norte zone could be even larger by volume than the Bonza Las Peñas discovery.
All this information was made available by Aurelian via their website. However, the market did not recognize the importance of these geological clues. Aurelian stock declined after the Bonza Las Peñas announcement and consolidated at low levels throughout 2005.
Summing it all up, astute investors had a chance to recognize Aurelian Resources as a speculative play with significant chances of a major discovery early on. The necessary information was hidden in plain sight on their website. Aurelian kept updating the reports, maps and cross sections on the website with great detail. As a matter of fact, Aurelian had one of the most informative and best structured websites of all junior gold companies. The quality of geological information they provided was outstanding.
Last year’s revision of the Ecuadorian mining law and the turmoil it raised among foreign mining companies, however, raise another important point: when is the time to get out of a stock like this? While the exact date of new government regulations cannot be predicted, a healthy degree of caution is warranted for companies in similar situations. Certainly, Aurelian appeared as a big dot on the radar of the Ecuadorian government after the initial discovery. The dot surely grew larger after the 43-101 compliant initial inferred resource calculation for the Fruta del Norte deposit came in at 13.7 million ounces. To many observers of the resource markets, Aurelian must have seemed like a sitting duck, waiting to be taken aim at. In a situation like this, at least partial profits should always be taken off the table, while new positions should be entered with great caution.
Leveraged Vehicles for Commodity Investment and Speculation
By Dirk Masuch Oesterreich
Foreword: This article was originally written for Brookshire Raw Materials in July of 2008. While most references to trends and prices are entirely out of tune with the current developments in the commodities markets, the investment vehicles mentioned here remain interesting for speculation.
The ongoing bull market in commodities sparked a whole new category of investment vehicles designed to follow or even leverage the price performance of the underlying commodity or sector stocks. These new instruments come along as Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) and Exchange Traded Notes (ETN).
The concept of ETF’s of course is nothing new. The NASDAQ PowerShares QQQQ has been around quite a while. The fund has been wildly successful as an instrument for investment and speculation. It was only a matter of time before similarly structured funds would be available for commodities investors.
Among the first of the new commodity ETF’s was the Gold Shares SPDR (GLD). The fund aims at tracking the price performance of gold bullion. The iShares Silver Trust (SLV) is designed to do the same for silver. The US Oil Fund ETF (USO) tracks the price of West Texas Intermediate Crude.
I don’t want to go into discussions whether GLD and SLV, at any given moment, do or do not hold all the bullion they claim to hold. Neither do I intend to discuss the specific details of any of the instruments that follow below. Like always, you should do your own research of the funds that may appeal to you.
There are funds and notes that trade to the long side and there are those that trade to the short side. There are long, short, double long, and double short exchange traded funds and notes on almost every commodity and sector stocks.
Now before diving head on into the world of highly leveraged commodities speculation, consider that these vehicles work in both directions. Make your best effort to ensure you are trading in the right direction. Otherwise it will feel like the wrath of Khan is upon you – you will lose money very fast.
A few examples will illustrate the tools investors and speculators now have in their box. Suppose you are of the opinion that high prices for corn and food for livestock will have to work their way into meat prices. The DJ Livestock ETN (COW) may be the vehicle to act on that opinion. On the other hand there is AGA, a two times leveraged short ETN on the price performance of the agricultural sector.
The US Gasoline Fund (UGA) would be interesting for those who think that gasoline prices in the
The precious metals complex also offers leveraged trading vehicles on their price performance. While GLD (gold) and SLV (silver) are already well established, the new ETNs DGP and DZZ offer a double long or a double short leverage. DGP may be interesting at the beginning of a new gold upswing while DZZ could be a vehicle for timing a correction. Just remember, buying into neither of these instruments entitles you to physically hold gold or silver bullion. GLD and SLV even have to occasionally buy and sell bullion to achieve their stated goal to keep track of the bullion price.
In this context an often overlooked fund may offer a conservative investor more peace of mind than the funds mentioned above. The Central Fund of Canada (CEF) is a very conservatively managed and strictly audited fund that holds securely vaulted gold and silver bullion. It does not engage in market actions to adjust its holdings for price performance since it does not intend to track the bullion price. However, the fund occasionally adds to its holdings. It does so by offering a number of new shares in line with the value of the added bullion so that dilution is not an issue. Metal in CEF’s property basically sits in a Canadian bank vault and defines the fund’s Net Asset Value around which the share price of the fund fluctuates.
The clean tech / alternative energy sectors also provide a wide diversification of funds and ETNs. TAN and KWT are globally diversified vehicles of investing in the solar energy sector. Both of them offer options trading for leverage. If you subscribe to the fear of a global water crisis, several instruments are available for investing in the water industry as well as the clean tech sector.
Nuclear energy these days is making a comeback as a reliable energy source. The Market Vectors Nuclear Energy ETF and the PowerShares Global Nuclear Energy ETF offer participation in this trend. They invest in energy providers like German giant E.ON and global industrial conglomerates like Toshiba. NLR also holds shares of uranium miners Cameco and Uranium One.
Last but not least, the Market Vectors Coal ETF (KOL) is a simple way to participate in the growing bull market in coal. While surely not counting as clean energy coal is still the major energy source worldwide. Reserves are plenty and there is no “Peak Coal” in sight. In times of Peak Oil and ever rising oil prices coal is again gaining traction as the most reliable source of energy. Options of KOL can be traded for leverage.
The effect of these new instruments on commodity markets will probably be increased price volatility. They may also divert capital into funds that would otherwise be invested in shares of commodity producers and explorers. This has surely been the case with the junior mining sector, especially the exploration companies. Their performance over the last two years or so has been nothing but frustrating. The big miners as indexed by the HUI also seem to have lost their former leverage factor to the gold price. It may well be that they lost a great amount of shareholder capital to GLD and SLV.
I don’t know if this is a good thing or a bad thing. As an investor you probably don’t care too much as long as the long term trend of your investment doesn’t break while a trigger happy speculator will probably be delighted by the new trading tools he now has in his arsenal. In any case prepare for more interesting times to come.
Are there risks associated with these exchange traded funds and notes? Plenty. Each of these vehicles has its own specific risk related to the underlying commodities or the performance of their sector stocks. There is, however, an additional specific risk to consider. It is the risk related to the bank issuing these instruments. In today’s environment, this has to be a serious consideration. There is no use in being right in the choice of your ETF/ETN when the issuing bank is at risk of going out of business. Holding an ETF or an ETN is holding a paper promise. It is not clear how an investor holding a certain ETN would be made whole in the case of a bank default.
Written 7 July 2008. First published in Dexterity News, Brookshire Raw Materials.
| SYMBOL | NAME | OPTIONS | LONG / SHORT |
| | | | |
| | AGRICULTURE | | |
| | | | |
| COW | iPath DJ AIG Livestock ETN | | 1x long |
| MOO | Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF | X | 1x long |
| DBA | DB Powershares Agriculture | X | 1x long |
| AGF | DB Agriculture long ETN | | 1x long |
| DAG | DB Agriculture double long ETN | | 2x long |
| ADZ | DB Agriculture short ETN | | 1x short |
| AGA | DB Agriculture double short ETN | | 2x short |
| | | | |
| | OIL OR GAS | | |
| | | | |
| USO | US Oil Fund | X | 1x long |
| UGA | US Gasoline Fund | X | 1x long |
| UHN | US Heating Oil | | 1x long |
| UNG | US Natural Gas | X | 1x long |
| DBO | Power Shares DB Oil Fund | X | 1x long |
| OIH | Merril Lynch Oil Services Holders | X | 1x long |
| FCG | First Trust ISE-Revere Natural Gas | X | 1x long |
| OLO | DB Powershares Crude long | | 1x long |
| DXO | DB Powershares Crude double long | | 2x long |
| SZO | DB Powershares Crude short | | 1x short |
| DTO | DB Powershares Crude double short | | 2x short |
| | | | |
| | OIL AND GAS | | |
| | | | |
| IEO | Ishares Dow Jones | | 1x long |
| XOP | Spiders Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | X | 1x long |
| DIG | Ultra Oil & Gas ProShares | X | 2x long |
| DUG | Ultra Short Oil & Gas | X | 2x short |
| | | | |
| | ENERGY (GENERAL) | | |
| | | | |
| IXC | iShares S&P Gobal Energy | X | 1x long |
| IYE | iShares Dow Jones US Energy | X | 1x long |
| XLE | Energy Select Sector SPDR | X | 1x long |
| DBE | PowerShares DB Energy | X | 1x long |
| ENY | Claymore/SWM Canadian Energy Income | | 1x long |
| PXE | PowerShares Dynamic Exploration & Production | X | 1x long |
| | | | |
| | GOLD AND SILVER ETF & ETN | | |
| | | | |
| GLD | Gold Shares SPDR | X | 1x long |
| DGP | DB Gold Double Long ETN | | 2x long |
| DGZ | DB Gold Short ETN | | 1x short |
| DZZ | DB Gold Double Short ETN | | 2x short |
| SLV | iShares Silver Trust | | 1x long |
| | | | |
| | ALTERNATIVE ENERGY | | |
| | | | |
| TAN | Claymore/MAC Global Solar Energy | X | 1x long |
| KWT | Market Vectors Solar Energy ETF | X | 1x long |
| CGW | Claymore S&P Global Water | X | 1x long |
| PIO | Power Shares Global Water | X | 1x long |
| FIW | First Trust ISE Water | X | 1x long |
| PHO | Power Shares Water Resource | X | 1x long |
| GEX | Market Vectores Global Alternative Energy ETF | | 1x long |
| PBD | Power Shares Global Clean Energy | | 1x long |
| PBW | Power Shares Wilderhill Clean Energy | X | 1x long |
| | | | |
| | NUCLEAR ENERGY | | |
| | | | |
| NLR | Market Vectors Nuclear Energy ETF | | 1x long |
| PKN | PowerShares Global Nuclear Energy | | 1x long |
| | | | |
| | COAL | | |
| | | | |
| KOL | Market Vectors Coal ETF | X | 1x long |
Water, this most precious of liquids, is constantly generating headlines, TV news reports, and analysis that make us think a global water crisis is upon us. Around the world wells seem to dry up at an alarming rate, the water table seems to drop almost everywhere we look, and water generally seems to get more scarce by the day. In a word, the world seems to be running out of water. The remaining water reserves are constantly being polluted by industrial and urban wastewaters. More and more people lack access to safe potable water and adequate sanitation. Desertification, droughts and water related diseases are a sad reality. Water infrastructure is decaying fast and generally lacks necessary maintenance and repair. Even water wars are predicted, especially for the
For the astute investor in crisis there is always opportunity. To spot these opportunities it is advisable to first get a hold on the big picture. Facts have to be separated from misconceptions, myths, and outright lies. Ultimately, any investment is driven by the underlying fundamentals. Of course, this is not different in the water business. So we will first focus on some facts about water as a natural resource and then turn our attention to the resulting investment opportunities in the global water business which is estimated to serve a market of up to $ 500 billion per year. A market of this size surely is worth your attention.
Commodities prices are basically driven by the simple laws of supply and demand. It is commonly held that the supply-demand fundamentals for investing in the water business could not be better: we have an ever growing demand for the underlying commodity by a growing world population and a decreasing supply of potable and safe water. But where can you actually check supply-demand balances and open interests in water futures contracts? Or, for that matter, even the price of water? Obviously, for those who demand exact figures to base their investment decisions upon there is a dilemma. You can check the price of water on your water bill or at your local water utility. But that is not really helpful. There is no website that quotes a global water price. Nor can you secure future demand by locking in futures contracts. There is no real quoted market for water. Water prices are different in other countries. They are even different in other regions of the same country. So where do we get the supply figures from?
A bit of hydrological science is in order at this point. Water is commonly believed to be a huge but finite resource since there is only so much water available on the planet. Furthermore, due to constant and increasing contamination this resource base has to be declining. This basic supply-demand assumption is not entirely correct, though. In the grand scheme of things, the planetary hydrological cycle, not a drop of water is lost. The amount of water even increases by very small amounts from magmatic water. The hydrological cycle is the closest thing to a self-containing continuum. It is powered by the solar energy from the sun which causes water to evaporate from the oceans. When carried into the atmosphere evaporated water is pure since the salts of the sea are left behind. Water vapor moves through the air as part of the weather phenomena we all know. Under suitable atmospheric conditions water vapor condenses and forms droplets: it rains. Water that falls on land moves through the cycle by a number of different paths. It contributes to replenishing subsurface aquifers, lakes and rivers. Parts of it evaporate. Other parts find their way back into the oceans by surface runoffs or groundwater flow.
Water may become scarce in some region at any time. Other parts of the world may experience unusually heavy precipitations. However, the overall planetary water budget is quite nicely balanced. Keep that in mind the next time somebody tells you the world is running out of water.
There is no need for a global panic related to water shortages (I am likely to draw some comments with this opinion which is not a majority point of view). Contrary to oil, gas, or mineral resources, water is a renewable resource, even within the lifetime of human beings. To use an analogy from the oil business: there is no such thing as “Peak Water”. This means that it is possible to manage water resources under concepts of sustainable development. There is enough water suitable for human consumption on earth to supply the present and future population. The catch is that it is not always available where we want or need it to be. In many cases this is related to the lack of financial resources that can be directed to the building of water infrastructure.
It is not a mere coincidence that most countries that experience water problems are among the poorest on earth. A point could be made for poverty being directly related to, or even being the cause, of many water problems in developing countries. Bad economics rather than bad environment are often a root cause for the lack of access to water and sanitation and the spread of diseases.
On a regional scale, severe water problems are a reality and are mostly related to the reduced availability of water or to the lack of access to potable water and adequate sanitation. Some of the problems are in fact caused or exacerbated by improper water management and/or poor planning. Megacities, for instance, assembled in hydrological basins that do not provide the water resources to sustain a multi-million population quite obviously have what we perceive as a water problem, but is it really that?
The solutions to supplying any given population with its necessary water resources historically have mostly been on a local or regional level. Administrative and political boundaries often were an impediment on the development of shared water resources. Lately, this approach has been changing to an integrated watershed management approach that comprises the entire hydrological basin and catchment area, regardless of administrative boundaries. Necessarily, this involves bilateral or multilateral cooperation in the field of water resources management. Aquifers and river basins do not stop at state borders.
Does this mean, as is sometimes advocated for the future, that countries will go to war over water resources? I don’t think this is very likely. Actually, I heard the scenario of water wars for the first time about 20 years ago. I have been waiting for them to materialize ever since. What at first glance seems to have an inevitable logic does not hold up at a closer look. The simple reason against water wars is economics: it just does not make any sense. For the costs of a week of war a nation could easily build a couple of desalination plants or start an overhaul of its water infrastructure. From a military point of view it is even less convincing. To secure its upstream water resources a country would essentially have to indefinitely secure the whole catchment area on foreign soils. Major powers not counted, very few countries in the world have the means to do this. So the most likely outcome is actually a more peaceful cooperation between nations by further agreements to jointly manage their transboundary water resources.
It is a striking fact that water generally is not priced according to the real value it provides to our way of living. This is even more true considering its absolute necessity to sustain life itself. The cost of water being delivered to our homes is not reflected in its price. This statement is true for almost everywhere in the world. Water safe for human consumption needs to be explored for, collected, treated, delivered to where it is needed, and finally, disposed off as wastewater. All of this comes at a cost.
The reasons for the pricing of water are mostly political. I do not expect this anomaly to last indefinitely, though. Water prices will have to adjust upward. This will probably be a gradual process that takes years. The public perception of water is still that of a free resource that everybody has a right of being delivered at essentially no cost. However, a market price for water could probably lead to more efficient allocations of this resource. Surely it will lead to a more thoughtful use and less wasting. What comes to mind when talking about a more efficient resource allocation is not so much individual households but the agricultural and industrial use of water. There is a huge potential for saving water in agriculture by applying more efficient irrigation techniques.
I remember a discussion with water executives of one of Mexico´s major cities some years ago. They were (and are) still spending a great amount of money on public education about adequate treatment of water. At some point I mentioned that all they have to do is raise the water price to a level that reflects its real value to avoid misuse and wasteful habits. The Director of the city’s water works gave me the answer that I almost expected: ¨We know that. But don’t you try that on my watch¨.
Some months ago we had an expert panel on future urban development. The water panel brought together the city’s leading water engineers and scientists. There was a broad consensus among the panel that water prices should be raised or even left free to find its real market price. You won’t find that part of the recommendations in any press release.
What has become clear by now is that water investing is very different from investing in most other commodities and their respective industries. The big difference lies in the pricing. With the price of water presently restricted mostly for political reasons it is hard to make a point for the supply-demand balance as a good reason for investments. Water is not your typical commodity that rises and falls in price due to market forces or seasonality.
On the other hand, this very price characteristic effectively reduces business risks. The water business is essentially a non-cyclical business which offers some of the safer long-term investment opportunities.
As an example, just think of the growing consumption of bottled water. While in the
So for practical purposes what investment opportunities in the water business exist? The water industry is as diverse as you can imagine. Businesses center around all basic services related to water. It needs to be extracted, stored, collected, treated, delivered, and finally, disposed off. The companies involved in these processes offer opportunities for investment in this business, with water utilities being the most obvious choice.
Global players in this multi-billion market are French conglomerates
One investment opportunity, though, seems to stand out as a business with a lot of growth potential. While the overall amount of water on the planet is rather stable, the amount available for human consumption is declining. Contributing factors are as diverse as saltwater intrusion into coastal aquifers and any sort of contamination. The amount of freshwater being lost can partially be made up for by adequate treatment of seawater, brackish waters, and even waste waters. The purification technology at hand is membrane filtration by means of reverse osmosis. Companies involved in this business should have an ever growing demand for their technology and services. It wouldn’t be a bad idea either to look for companies originating from and doing business in
To sum it all up, I do not agree to the case for a global water crisis. However, I do see tremendous business opportunities in the growing global water market due to the fact that clean water and sanitation are not available wherever and whenever it is desired. In those cases when natural conditions are not a constraint these problems often have a technical solution that can be provided by standard engineering techniques. Of course, all this comes at a price.
Like it or not, water prices are likely to rise at some point in the future to secure the supply of and the access to water for a growing world population.
Foto:
Behind Victoria Resource Corp’s (VIT.V) recent core hole NW-5 at the Cove-McCoy project
By Dirk Masuch Oesterreich
I wanted to write this for months. I had Victoria Resource Corp. on my mind ever since I came back from the Geological Society of Nevada’s fall field trip in September. Now events passed me by, and what events they were.
Yesterday, Victoria Resource Corp. announced gold assays from core hole NW-5 at the Cove-McCoy property in north-central
I became aware of Victoria Resource Corp. during the GSN fall field trip in September. Eight out of ten of
The discovery at Cove-McCoy did not come like a rabbit out of a hat. In January this year,
How did it come to this? The secret behind
Right. This is the same Cove mine close to
Other important articles written by members of
Henry, C. D. & Ressel, M. W. (2000): Eocene magmatism of northeastern
Ressel, M. W. & Henry, C. D. (2006): Igneous Geology of the Carlin Trend,
And finally, Mike’s PhD dissertation:
Ressel, M. W. (2005): Igneous Geology of the Carlin Trend,
The real secret weapon in
Raul Madrid worked with Dr. Ralph Roberts for 18 years. During this period they refined the criteria for defining gold belts in the western
Dr. Raul Madrid is applying structural analytical methods leading to refined predictive methods in gold exploration. Raul sees the need for future exploration in
It is that vision that separates
A good starting point for your own due diligence on Victoria Resource Corp. is their website which is a bit of a showoff for whoever coded it. On the other hand, it’s refreshing to see a design that does not use the same design template that 90 % of all the other junior companies seem to be using. It is certainly among the better and most informative sites in this sector.
If you are interested in a Google Earth kmz-file to see the exact location of the drill site I'll be happy to email it to you. Please contact me at info@servicioshidrogis.com.
NEWS: Recent developments at Mexivada Mining Corp. (MNV.V)
By Dirk Masuch Oesterreich
Mexivada Mining. Corp. (MNV.V, MXVDF) was having a lot of action in its share price during the last two months. It went from an intraday low of less than 50 cents to an all-time high at 1.20 CDN and back to 0.70 CDN. It is today at 0.78. What’s behind all this?
Mexivada adopted a shareholder rights plan on November 6th, which did not occur in response to a proposal to acquire control of the company. There was, however, at that time a note by Eric Hommelberg of www.golddrivers.com that seemingly raised investor awareness. Cannacord and TD Securities acted as buyers at these levels, giving a great sign of confidence in the company.
On November 8th Mexivada reported that it has discovered a previously unknown porphyry molybdenum-rhenium-gold-silver system at its Moly Dome property in the
What follows is the detailed geological description taken from the press release at their website:
Molybdenite-pyrite veined quartz stockwork breccia was intersected in brecciated metasedimentary rocks, just below the thin soil cover, down to a depth of
COMMENT: Note that these are very preliminary results. Cores still have to be analyzed to know what they really found.
Mexivada’s stock price spiked on the news at 1.20 CDN and then fell off a cliff to
Technically, MNV now sits at its 200 dma support and seems to be in oversold territory. Before you decide to jump in on the stock consider this: The 2-year chart shows a clearly established uptrend. It also shows some rather wild swings around the 200 dma trendline. MNV has something for every taste. As an investor with a longer term outlook you will like the established uptrend. However, be prepared to have your resolve gut checked on the way up. And as a gunslinging speculator it is just those wild swings that you will love for providing you with entry and exit points. Whatever you do, be careful with this stock. Mexivada is not for the faint of heart.
On a more personal note, I had the chance to sit down with Rick Redfern, Mexivada’s CEO and President, in the bar of Elko’s Comfort Inn during the GSN fall field trip. Rick just flew in that night from
Mexivada was mentioned on this blog for the first time in May this year. If you got in then you would have been sitting on more than a double during the recent action.
(Map generated from my database of stock exchange listedPeak Oil in a Nutshell
By Dirk Masuch Oesterreich
Summary: Peak Oil is a reality. It is, however, a tough call to predict when world oil supplies will start to run out.
(The original article was published on Dexterity News, a commodities information bulletin from Brookshire Raw Materials.)
The recent discussion goes back to 1956 when Shell research geologist M. King Hubbert predicted
Imagine a graph that plots cumulative production of a determined area on the horizontal axis, and the ratio of annual production to cumulative production on the vertical axis. A falling trend line appears that will at some point intersect with the horizontal axis at which point production will equal zero. This is quite similar to what Dr. Colin Campbell, one of the most prominent advocates of Peak Oil, calls “a simple theory that any beer drinker understands”: Once the glass is half empty depletion is fully under way.
In terms of Peak Oil depletion means that once an oil field / a producing area / a country / the world is on the down side of the approximately bell shaped production curve it is never to recover to older levels on a sustained basis, even, and this is a point that is hotly debated, if new discoveries are made. Peak Oil theory implies that the biggest oil fields and the easy to find oil were already found. It says that the world’s ability to produce oil depends only on the amount of the non producing fraction, which is the amount to still be found. The less there is the harder it is to find. Exploring for what is left will be more difficult and more costly. Cheap oil is a thing of the past.
Let’s look at an example to illustrate this point. World demand for crude oil is presently well over 80 million barrels a day. Assume the discovery of a new oil field is announced with a reserve estimate of 1 billion barrels. It would be a boon for the company that made the discovery. However, at present consumption this would add less than two weeks to world supply. Considering the long time frame it needs to take a newly discovered field to production a dilemma becomes obvious: we need to find new big oil fields and we need to find them fast.
It is a fact of nature that a finite resource at some point will show a production peak and deplete thereafter. Discussion of Peak Oil theory does not evolve around this point but mostly centers on two issues:
1. When is world oil production going to peak (or did it already)?
2. What will be the implications?
In its recently published study “Statistical Review of World Energy” (June 2007) BP says that the world has enough proven reserves to provide 40 years of consumption at current rates. This quickly prompted a comment from the
Though the exact year of peak world oil production will probably only be obvious after it occurred it makes sense to assume that we are presently living in the period of peaking oil production. No need for panic here, this is not the end of the world. It is, however, a transitional period that will be recognized as having profound implications for our way of living and that we will have to adjust for sooner rather than later.
There is, of course, a lot of criticism of Peak Oil theory. One particular argument, for instance, says that it does not take into account